Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1095
Plaintiff: RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant: THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: ROY A. COOPER, III and JOSHUA STEIN
Rodney Pierce v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 23-2317
Plaintiff: RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant: THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Timothy Moore v. Democracy North Carolina
as 20-2118
Appellant: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, JOHN P. CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: BOBBY HEATH, ALAN SWAIN, MAXINE WHITLEY and others
Defendant: STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the Noth Carolina State Board of Elections, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant: SANDRA MALONE, NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, BECKY JOHNSON and others
Timothy Moore v. Damon Circosta
as 20-2107
Defendant / Appellee: STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the Noth Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, BOBBY HEATH and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SANDRA MALONE, JADE JUREK, BECKY JOHNSON and others
Timothy Moore v. Damon Circosta
as 20-2062
Plaintiff / Appellee: BOBBY HEATH, MAXINE WHITLEY, PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and others
Defendant / Appellant: KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant: CAREN RABINOWITZ, SANDRA MALONE, BECKY JOHNSON and others
League of Women Voters v. RNC
as 20-1728
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MANDY COHEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT K. PRIDDY, III, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, LELIA BENTLEY and others
Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor: TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity a President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
NC NAACP State Conference v. Ken Raymond We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1092
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFERSON CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAVID C. BLACK, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP, HIGH POINT NAACP and others
Intervenor: TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
NC NAACP State Conference v. Philip Berger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2273
Appellant: PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP, HIGH POINT NAACP and others
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFERSON CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAVID C. BLACK, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
In re: Philip Berger
as 19-2056
Petitioner: In re: PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Philip Berger v. NC State Conference of NAACP
as 19-2048
Appellant: PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP, HIGH POINT NAACP and others
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFERSON CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, DAVID C. BLACK, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?