Cases 1 - 10 of 188
SYMMES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv01004
Defendant:
MICHAEL PARSONS, RONNIE A. LOCKLEAR, FEMALE REVELS and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobey LaKemper v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6930
Plaintiff:
COBEY LAKEMPER
Defendant:
BARNEY OWENS, Warden of Pamlico C.I., TODD E. ISHEE and KENNETH E. LASSITER
FRAZIER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LOUIS FRAZIER and LuLuBell Michelle Frazier
Defendant:
TERRI CATLETT, OFFICER MARTIN, SGT HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Fuller v. Erik Hooks
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORRIS, BETTY BROWN, KENNETH LASSITER and others
Tracey Edwards v. Benita Witherspoon
as 24-7049
Defendant:
JAMES ALEXANDER, SHEIDA BRODIE, KAVONA GILL and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY EDWARDS
Gould v. Cooper et al
as 5:2024ct03240
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Salim Gould
Defendant:
Attorney General Joshua Stein, Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, Secretary Todd E. Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Buffaloe et al
as 5:2024ct03265
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Alston
Defendant:
Tony C. Harper, Timothy D. Moose, Antoine L. Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Fox et al
as 5:2024ct03264
Defendant:
N.C. State, James C. Fox and Todd E. Ishee
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Alexander v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6865
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DARREN G. JACKSON, Chairman of the North Carolina Post-Release and Parole Commission, TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections and TERESA R. O'BRIEN, Director of Combined Records
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.