Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Lawson
as 22-1483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE LAWSON, MATT HURRELL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and TODD YOUNG, United States Senator for Indiana
Preston Simpson v. Robert Mayer, et al
as 21-3894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Preston Wade Simpson
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert N. Mayer, Judge, Russell David Oliver, Stoddard County Prosecuting Attorney, Andrew Jeffrey Rehmer, Stoddard County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and others
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carthane v. Choi et al
as 8:2021cv02925
Plaintiff:
Vincent S. Carthane
Defendant:
Sara E. Choi, Kilo Kijakazi, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
