Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02455
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Suzanne Evans, Tom Schweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Kameron Tunstall
Respondent:
Tom Schweitzer and Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vokurka v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
JANICE VOKURKA
Defendant:
WARDEN TOM SCHWEITZER, CAPTAIN CHAMBERLAIN, CAPTAIN ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
as 2:2021cv05065
Petitioner:
Mohamed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibrahim v. Schweitzer
as 1:2021cv00648
Petitioner:
Mohamed Ibrahim
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Ohio Department of Corrections Rehabilitations (O.D.R.C.) et al
as 1:2021cv01565
Petitioner:
Steven Ross
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections Rehabilitations (O.D.R.C.) and Warden
Respondent:
Warden Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scullin v. Schweitzer
as 1:2021cv00485
Respondent:
Warden Tom Schweitzer
Petitioner:
Jeffrey W. Scullin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 5:2021cv00226
Petitioner:
Greg Clark
Respondent:
Warden Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
