Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TN St Conference of the NAACP, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al
as 21-6024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, DEMOCRACY NASHVILLE-DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITIES, THE EQUITY ALLIANCE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION and others
Hamilton, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
as 1:2020cv00484
Defendant:
John Reed, Tom Wheeler, County of Madera and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hamilton and Rick Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby Advocates, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al
as 19-6142
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDY BLACKBURN, DONNA BARRETT, GREGORY DUCKETT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITNEY THORNTON, MICHAEL KERNELL, JOE TOWNS, JR. and others
Amicus Curiae:
13 ELECTION OFFICIALS, U.S. TECHNOLOGY POLICY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY and NATIONAL ELECTION DEFENSE COALITION AND OTHER INDIVIDUAL ELECTION SECURITY EXPERTS
Johnston v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2017cv04306
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Tom Wheeler, Mignon Clyburn, Jessica Rosenworcel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis Neeley, Jr. v. 5 Federal Communications, etc., et al
as 14-3447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Curtis James Neeley, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
5 Federal Communications Commissioners, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, et al., U.S. Representative Steve Womack and others
Neeley v. 5 Federal Communications Commissioners et al
as 5:2014cv05135
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Neeley, Jr.
Defendant:
5 Federal Communications Commissioners, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, et al, Steve Womack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2255
Tom Wheeler, et al. v. A.c. And S., Inc., et al.
as NYE/1:02-CV-04973
Plaintiff:
Tom Wheeler
Defendant:
A.c. And S., Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
