Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Sanchez v. City of New York
as 22-1050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elvis Sanchez
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain White, Captain Monroe, Intake Security and Correction Officer Daif
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, A.M.K.C. 9B Steady Area Captain, Whitaker, A.M.K.C. Captain and others
Feliz v. Park
as 20-2999
Respondent / Appellee:
Charles Solomon, Jung Park, Tony Durante and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Feliz
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELIZ v. PARK et al
as 1:2019cv03861
Defendant:
ABRAHAM CLOTT, JUNG PARK, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER FELIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2019cv11661
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. New York County et al
as 1:2019cv08009
Plaintiff:
Jabari Mann
Defendant:
Tony Durante, New York County, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv06424
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Monica Stahlmann, C.O. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01259
Plaintiff:
Elvis Sanchez
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calderon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03643
Plaintiff:
Lauren Calderon
Defendant:
City Of New York , Victor Vasquez, Tony Durante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Manhattan Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02589
Plaintiff:
Adam Hamilton, Daheim Salley, Raymond Williams and others
Defendant:
Manhattan Detention Center and Tony Durante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
