Cases 1 - 10 of 17
R.H. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv05706
Plaintiff:
R.H., a minor, by and through his legal guardian, Raylene Johnson, Tony Jones, April Holder and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Jackie Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony Jones v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2015cv01918
Defendant:
County of Riverside, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Christopher Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tony Jones
RONALD DUDLEY V. D.W. NEVEN
as 3:1998cv00350
Defendant:
Bill Book, Tony Carlysle, Bill Donat and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dudley
Estate of Matthew Cicelske et al v. Humphrey (#8624P) et al
as 3:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Estate of Matthew Cicelske , Cameron Cicelske , Antonio Cicelske and others
Defendant:
Adam Humphrey (#8624P) , Michael Beaver (#8095) , Clifford Wong (#8196P) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raymond Padilla v. Debra Brooks, et al
as 12-15031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA BROOKS, ADAM ENDEL, E. K. MCDANIEL and others
Delask Pittman v. Renee Baker, et al
as 11-16788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELASK PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, DEBRA BROOKS, BRIAN DRAIN and others
Pittman v. Baker et al
as 3:2011cv00294
Defendant:
Larry Baker, Renee Baker, Debra Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Delask Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2010cv00682
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Debra Brooks, Robert Chambliss and others
Plaintiff:
L. Seville Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
