Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Mulhern Gas Co., Inc. et al v. Rodriguez, et al
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Mulhern Gas Co., Inc., New York State Builders Association, National Association of Home Builders and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Rodriguez, New York Department of State, New York State Fire Prevention and Building Code Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Greeman et al v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv03233
Petitioner:
James Henry Greeman and Patrick Andrew Toomey
Respondent:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marlowe v. Guzman et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Marlowe
Defendant:
Isabella Casillas Guzman, Ltg Robert Skinner and Patrick Joseph Toomey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mario Ortiz, et al v. Ferrellgas Partners, et al
as 21-8010
Not Classified By Court:
In re: In Re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation
Petitioner:
Mario Ortiz, Stephen Morrison, Steven Tseffos and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Venezia, Michael S. Harvey, Gregory Ludvigsen and others
Respondent:
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., a limited partnership, Ferrellgas, L.P., a limited partnership, doing business as Blue Rhino and UGI Corporation, a corporation
State of Arizona, et al v. USDC-AZT
as 21-71312
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STATE OF ARIZONA, ANDY TOBIN, PAUL SHANNON and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Greeman et al v. Saul
as 0:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Petitioner:
James H. Greeman and Patrick A. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Enrico Lanza v. Michael Moclock, et al
as 20-2764
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY LUSCAVAGE, Deputy Supt. for Centralized Services, DR. MICHAEL A. MOCLOCK, SCI Coal Township, SENATOR PAT TOOMEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRICO FABIANO LANZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
