Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC v. INTERMOUNTAIN HEARING CENTERS DOCTORS OF AUDIOLOGY LLC
as 5:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC
Defendant:
INTERMOUNTAIN HEARING CENTERS DOCTORS OF AUDIOLOGY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC v. Intermountain Hearing Centers Doctors of Audiology, LLC
as 2:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC
Defendant:
Intermountain Hearing Centers Doctors of Audiology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOUZE v. DEBO MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01555
Defendant:
DEBO MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. and MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN A. HOUZE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC. v. CBM GROUPE et al
as 5:2017cv03955
Plaintiff:
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC.
Defendant:
CBM GROUPE, CBM N.A. INC., CBM US INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
LUELLEN v. MAROADI TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01846
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LUELLEN
Defendant:
MAROADI TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC., JOHN F. DOWNEY and MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGill et al v. Laau et al
as 4:2016cv02320
Plaintiff:
Lois McGill and Robert T. McGill
Defendant:
Li Lenny Laau, Schneider National Carriers Inc., Ronald Dubay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC v. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03103
Plaintiff:
NEOPART TRANSIT, LLC
Defendant:
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, INC. , JESHUA D. SMITH , ANTHONY J. KOZAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
