Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Houston v. Ford et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford, Joseph M Lombardo, Brian E. Williams Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Bean et al
as 2:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Brian Williams, Sr., Nevada Attorney General and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Bean et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 2:2022cv02168
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Productions, Encore Event Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Houston v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01745
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 2:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies and Dianne Ferrante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
