Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Crutchfield v. Jaccson et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Jaccson and Kent Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caddell et al v. Obion County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Caddell, Deandre" Pickering, Gary Baker and others
Defendant:
Obion County Detention Center, Carl Jackson, Kent Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Kissell, et al
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kacey Kissell, Kent Treece and Karl Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Karl Jackson, Kasye Kissell and Kent Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Martez Darrell Curry
Defendant:
Karl Jackson, Kent Treece, FNU Kissell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell, Michael Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell and Maggie Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treece v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01531
Plaintiff:
Lisa Treece
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loraine v. Obion County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01032
Defendant:
Haylee Crowell, Kent Treece, Karl Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Loraine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Treece et al
as 1:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Jennifer Shirley and Kent Treece
Plaintiff:
Luther Ray Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
