Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Adams et al
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Adams, Toni Michelle Adams, Amy Lester Astin and others
Defendant:
Bordeau Metals Southeast, LLC, BB&K Holdings, LLC, BB&K Holdings TN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Lee v. USA
as 5:2023cv01490
Petitioner:
Trevor Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13535
Plaintiff:
TREVOR LEE BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHURMAN v. EDENFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCHURMAN
Defendant:
DONALD EDENFIELD and TREVOR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHIE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19583
Plaintiff:
TREVOR LEE RICHIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FAHLMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19105
Plaintiff:
TREVOR LEE FAHLMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07969
Plaintiff:
TREVOR LEE FELT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPRAGUE v. EDENFIELD et al
as 5:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
JESSICA SPRAGUE
Defendant:
SHERIFF DONALD EDENFIELD, ZACHARY WESTER, TREVOR LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. EDENFIELD et al
as 5:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME SMITH
Defendant:
DONALD EDENFIELD as SHERIFF JACKSON COUNTY, TREVOR LEE and DONALD EDENFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Baxter v. Louis Roberts, III, et al
as 21-11428
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS ROBERTS, III and TREVOR LEE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BAXTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
