Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, v. FERC
as 24-9516
Petitioner:
TRI-STATE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Basin Electric Power Cooperative
Defendant:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
Intervenor:
Northwest Rural Public Power District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, v. FERC
as 23-1217
Petitioner:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association,, et al v. FERC
as 23-1079
Petitioner:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc., High Plains Power, Inc., Jemez Mountains Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Basin Electric Power Cooperative
Defendant:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cloud Peak Energy Inc et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2019cv00120
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director, United States Department of Interior and others
Petitioner:
National Mining Association, Cloud Peak Energy Inc, Wyoming Mining Association and others
Intervenor:
State of California and State of New Mexico
Consolidated Petitioner:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc, American Petroleum Institute, Western Fuels-Wyoming Inc and others
Amicus Curiae:
Independent Petroleum Association of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner:
CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
API, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8077
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc et al v. United States Department of the Interior Secretary et al
as 2:2019cv00126
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director, Gregory J Gould and others
Petitioner:
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc, Western Fuels Wyoming Inc, Basin Electric Power Cooperative and others
Intervenor:
State of California and State of New Mexico
Defendant:
Northern Plains Resource Counsel
Amicus Curiae:
Independent Petroleum Association of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
