Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Troy Oswald, et al v. Danielle Ireland-Imhof, et al
as 22-1742
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY OSWALD, DAVID RIOS and MICHAEL MCDUFFIE
Defendant:
DANIELLE IRELAND-IMHOF
Defendant / Appellee:
PASSAIC COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE and ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Amicus Curiae:
KAHOLIN PENA and YOHANE PERDOMO
OSWALD et al v. IRELAND-IMHOF et al
as 2:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
TROY OSWALD, DAVID RIOS and MICHAEL MCDUFFIE
Defendant:
DANIELLE IRELAND-IMHOF, PASSAIC COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae:
Yohane Perdomo and Kaholin Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CASCIANO v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2019cv09475
Defendant:
JERRY SPEZIALE, TROY OSWALD, ROGER THEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CASCIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOTO v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2018cv11311
Defendant:
ABC ENTITIES 1-5, CITY OF PATERSON, CHIEF OF POLICE TROY OSWALD, in his personal, individual and official capacities, and others
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA SOTO, individually and as proposed Administratrix of the ESTATE OF XAVIER CUEVAS-SOTO, ADRIANNA SOTO and YOLANDA SOTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aslon Goow, Sr. v. James Wittig, et al
as 13-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASLON GOOW, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WITTIG, TROY OSWALD and CITY OF PATERSON
LEARY v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04514
Plaintiff:
ANGEL M. LEARY
Defendant:
PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAPP v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04267
Plaintiff:
JASON SAPP
Defendant:
PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOOW v. TORRES et al
as 2:2008cv06285
Plaintiff:
ASLON GOOW, SR.
Defendant:
JOSE TORRES, JAMES T. WITTIG, TROY OSWALD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
