Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Tucker v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Barry Tucker
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of and Matthew Frits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Tucker & Sons, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Dale Bradley Barbour
Defendant:
Tucker & Sons, LLC and David J Tucker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tucker v. MARS Inc
as 5:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Margaret R Tucker
Defendant:
MARS Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loftis v. Tucker et al
as 6:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Sterling Tucker and Brylun Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Sams Club Inc
as 5:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Tucker, Jr
Defendant:
Sams Club Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Tucker v. Marsee et al
as 5:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Markeith D Tucker
Defendant:
Angela C Marsee, Chris Counts, Colt Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
