Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FRANKLIN v. TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA and SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018op45379
Plaintiff:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00101
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as GAM/5:18-cv-00101
Plaintiff:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA
Defendant:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION , CARDINAL HEALTH INC , MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
PENNINGTON v. TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00244
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALLEN PENNINGTON
Defendant:
TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA and TWIGGS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PENNINGTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN PENNINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA, KEVIN WRYE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PENNINGTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN PENNINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TWIGGS COUNTY GEORGIA, KEVIN WRYE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shasta Poole v. Alex Bell, et al
as 12-12387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHASTA A POOLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX BELL, WILLIAM R. STOKES, JR., ANTHONY WATSON and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGIA et al
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, THE GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Movant:
BYRON PEACH CHARTER SCHOOL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
