Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Syndio Solutions, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Syndio Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Banco Azteca
as 5:2024mc80091
Plaintiff:
Banco Azteca
Not Yet Classified:
Meta, Twitter, Inc. and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Caldwell v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv02022
Defendant:
X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Agrawal et al v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv01304
Defendant:
X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Parag Agrawal, Ned Segal, Vijaya Gadde and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Magdalina Kalincheva v. Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff:
Magdalina Kalincheva, Jesse Neubarth and Jeffrey Neubarth
Cross Defendant:
Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks, UA Valentyna and Child22A Lesovitskaya, 10 RICO Liza and others
Sifuentes v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
