Cases 1 - 10 of 100
FORD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LILROD FORD
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. DANIEL et al
as 5:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Defendant:
TEMPEST DANIEL and TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oliver et al
as 1:2026cv03653
Petitioner:
Roderick B. Smith
Respondent:
Commissioner Tyrone Oliver and Warden Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashe v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Corey Ashe
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Tyrone Oliver, Special Unit Cobra Tactic Squad (John Doe(s)) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VICK v. OLIVER
as 1:2026cv00111
Petitioner:
WESLEY PRICE VICK, JR
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Oliver et al
as 5:2026cv00233
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HOWARD, TYRONE OLIVER, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashe v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
Corey Ashe
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Joshua Jones, Regional Agent Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VICK v. OLIVER
as 5:2026cv00231
Petitioner:
WESLEY PRICE VICK, JR
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLIVER v. CITY OF POOLER et al
as 5:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
CITY OF POOLER, LOGANS ROADHOUSE II LLC, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Howard v. Oliver et al
as 1:2026cv03076
Plaintiff:
Ernest Howard
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Brian Kemp and Warden Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
