Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WILSON et al v. MONGON et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Wilson and Jessica Bruckner
Defendant:
THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH, HEATHER HOWLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Aleman v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2021cv20539
Defendant:
John M. Berra, E. Follin Smith, Robert E Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
John Aleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod et al v. Krueger et al
as 4:2015cv03119
Defendant:
Mary Lou Carollo, Dennis P. Krueger, Kerry Krueger and others
Plaintiff:
International Lutheran Laymen's League and Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shannon v. Melo et al
as 3:2013cv03694
Plaintiff:
Steve Shannon
Defendant:
John Melo, Arthur Levinson, Ralph Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mahru v. Lothan et al
as 1:2011cv04012
Plaintiff:
William Mahru
Defendant:
Alexander A Lothan, Ellis Rosenzweig , Shai Lothan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smutek v. Perelman et al
as 1:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Richard Smutek
Defendant:
Ronald O. Perelman, David L. Kennedy, Alan T. Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAO v. TOWERS WATSON & CO. et al
as 2:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
ALICE PAO
Defendant:
TOWERS WATSON & CO., TOWERS WATSON PENNSYLVANIA, INC., ANNE D. BODNAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Garofalo v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
John Garofalo
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Ronald O. Perelman, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Potter, et al v. Hughes, et al
as 06-56082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE G. POTTER and CHARLES B. KRIEGER
Defendant - Appellee:
B. WAYNE HUGHES, PUBLIC STORAGE, INC., a California corporation, B. WAYNE HUGHES, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
