Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vandross v. Williams et al.
as 8:2021cv01490
Plaintiff:
Charles Nemon Vandross
Defendant:
Perry Correctional Institution, Warden Charles Williams, Deputy Warden John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 20-7565
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, PRISON KEEPER BRIAN P. STIRLING, SUSAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Baccus v. State of South Carolina Criminal Justice System, The et al
as 9:2019cv02919
Plaintiff:
John Baccus and John Baccus Roosevelt
Defendant:
Warden Scott Lewis, Tamara Conwell, K. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Eaglin v. McCall
as 16-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN T. EAGLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALL, Sergeant
Defendant:
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden, FLORENCE MAUNEY, Assistant Warden, CURTIS EARLLY and others
Eaglin v. Sterling et al
as 0:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
Adrian T Eaglin
Defendant:
Bryant Sterling, Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
John Baccus v. N C Merchant
as 14-6912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
NC MERCHANT and TAMARA CONWELL
Baccus v. Sterling et al
as 9:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Brian Sterling, Tamara Conwell, Nancy C Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Merchant et al
as 9:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
N C Merchant and Tamara Conwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Merchant et al
as 1:2013cv02721
Plaintiff:
Trovon Keith
Defendant:
Nancy C Merchant, Tamara Conwell, Maria Leggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Rutledge et al
as 8:2010cv01023
Plaintiff:
Antwan Robinson
Defendant:
Jean Rutledge, Victoria Bugolun, Willhelmina Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
