Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 23-50888
Petitioner / Appellant:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 23-50711
Petitioner / Appellant:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Herrera-Tamayo v. Banet et al
as 4:2023cv02411
Plaintiff:
Liovel Herrera-Tamayo
Defendant:
Nicholas Ryan Banet and Drisco, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wong v. Bell Textron Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Candace Wong
Defendant:
Bell Textron Inc., Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01213
Petitioner:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larhonda Biggles v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
Larhonda Biggles
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harris County Sheriff Office, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
USA v. Tamayo Ovando
as 21-40698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Rodolfo Tamayo Ovando
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01042
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brenda Tamayo-Lara v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-60770
Petitioner:
Brenda Elizabeth Tamayo-Lara
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Torres et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2020cv02742
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Jamie Williams
Plaintiff:
Aida Torres and Marissa Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
