Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tamayo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
Rose Tamayo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tamayo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Alisa Tamayo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tamayo Danger v. Ingram et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Reina L. Tamayo Danger
Defendant:
Lorenzo L. Ingram, RJD Group, Inc. and S Expedited, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jose Marino Ortiz Molina
Cross Defendant:
Freeway Logistics, Inc.
Intervenor:
Humana Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Warning Order Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
CrossCountry Mortgage, Inc. v. Messina, et al.
as 1:2019cv01021
Defendant:
Luis Tamayo and Joseph Messina
Plaintiff:
CrossCountry Mortgage, Inc.
Upton et al v. LIS Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01351
Defendant:
ACE Logistics, LLC, LIS Logistics, LLC, Kroger Dedicated Logistics Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Upton and Stephanie Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge Tamayo-Mora v. Charles Wilkerson, et al
as 17-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE LUIS TAMAYO-MORA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WILKERSON, TONEY BAILEY and LADONNA THOMPSON
In re: Jose Tamayo
as 17-5085
Movant:
In re: JOSE ARISTIDES TAMAYO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tamayo-Mora v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jorge Tamayo-Mora
Defendant:
Charles Wilkerson, Toney Bailey and LaDonna Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamayo v. Parris
as 1:2015cv01080
Petitioner:
Felix Tamayo
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Tamayo Jimenez
as 2:2011mj30179
Defendant:
Jose Rosario Tamayo Jimenez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
