Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 23-50888
Petitioner / Appellant:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 23-50711
Petitioner / Appellant:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01213
Petitioner:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tamayo v. USA
as 3:2019cv00522
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tamayo-Pupo v. United States of America
as 7:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Tamayo-Pupo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tamayo v. USA
as 3:2016cv01863
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tamayo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Jorge Tamayo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar Tamayo v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70004
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR ARIAS TAMAYO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edgar Tamayo v. Rick Perry, et al
as 14-70003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR ARIAS TAMAYO
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK PERRY, Governor, RISSIE OWENS, Chairwoman of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, ROMULO CHAVEZ, Board Member and others
Edgar Tamayo v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70002
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR ARIAS TAMAYO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
