Cases 11 - 20 of 58
PRICE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
DELLWAYNE PRICE
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, LIEUTENANT HATCHER and SERGEANT HOPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS-EL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS-EL
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and CAPTAIN GWENDOLYN SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAYS-EL v. SMITH
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS-EL
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HILL v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
OTIS HILL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, UNIT MANAGER KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURDEN v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
DALVIN M BURDEN
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and SERGEANT KENDRICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYMBS v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
DEMARCO WYMBS
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, JAYLEN WHITE, AVERY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLIS v. SMITH
as 1:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
FRANK GILLIS
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slaughter v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02115
Petitioner:
Jerome Slaughter, Jr.
Respondent:
Tarmarshe Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILLIS v. SAIDANA et al
as 5:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
FRANK GILLIS
Defendant:
LT SAIDANA, LT WHITEHEAD, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
