Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Costellini's LLC v. Allan's Coffee & Tea Inc
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Costellini's, LLC
Defendant:
Allan's Coffee & Tea, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Uncommon Grounds Coffee & Tea, Inc. v. Uncommon Grounds, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10420
Plaintiff:
Uncommon Grounds Coffee & Tea, Inc.
Defendant:
Uncommon Grounds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
UNCOMMON GROUNDS COFFEE & TEA, INC. v. UNCOMMON GROUNDS, LTD.
as 5:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
UNCOMMON GROUNDS COFFEE & TEA, INC.
Defendant:
UNCOMMON GROUNDS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
D' Ambrosio v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Nikko D' Ambrosio
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Abbigail Rajala, Rodney Rajala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lewis et al v. Howel et al
as 3:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis
Defendant:
Tea, Inc., Maxim Howel, Scott Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Tea, Inc. v. Lewis
as 1:2023cv05481
Plaintiff:
Tea, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
