Cases 21 - 30 of 53
David Tejera v. Secretary, DOC
as 17-15191
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID TEJERA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Tejera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2017cv03081
Plaintiff:
Ramon C Tejera
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tejera v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv23567
Plaintiff:
David A. Tejera
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: David Tejera
as 17-11845
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID TEJERA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
HUNTER v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2017cv00353
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RANDY ROGERS, CARLOS TEJERA and others
Plaintiff:
LOURDES ASHLEY HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: David Tejera
as 16-15029
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID TEJERA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Jose Pizarro and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C.D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm. John/Jane Doe and Bus Drivers John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Peter Bohning, Abraham Thomas and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02314
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Peter Bohning and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C. D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm., John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejera v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02309
Plaintiff:
Almonmte Tejera
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Warden M.D.C. Jane Doe, M.D.C. Deputy Warden John Doe/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
