Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Perry Avram March
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Correction Services, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Morgan County Correctional Facility (JTS)
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Coy Williams
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Facility and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2017mc00009
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Handspike v. Tennessee Department of Correction et.al.
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dion Handspike
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Attorney General, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardin v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Hardin
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
