Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James-Bey v. N.C. Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, FNU Reynolds, J. Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James-Bey
James-Bey v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 1:2018cv00335
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety
James-Bey v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2018cv00355
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety and State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES-BEY v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
KENNETH LASSITER, FNU LEACH, FNU COPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James-Bey v. Lassiter et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, FNU Leach, FNU Copple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JAMES-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00755
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrance James-Bey v. USA, et al
as 14-5177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of the Treasury and United States Department of State
JAMES-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01101
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James-Bey v. Stancil
as 1:2013cv00183
Petitioner:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Respondent:
Renoice E. Stancil
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
