Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Weigel et al
as 4:2022cv03020
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roger Weigel, Terri Lemmon, Dan E. Ingalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Svejda et al
as 8:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Terry M. Svejda, Centurion Capital Management, Inc. and Terry Michael Svejda
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Servose v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2021cv03088
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bliemeister, City of Lincoln, Lancaster County and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Servose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole et al v. Lincoln et al
as 4:2021cv03030
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Lancaster County, Terry Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Elise Poole and Jackie Buntgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
