Cases 31 - 40 of 40
DAWSON v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00863
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE DAWSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLEW v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00146
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE PLEW
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11290
Plaintiff:
Audrey Lee and Terry Lee
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sec, et al v. Kimmes, et al
as 1:1989cv05942
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exch
Defendant:
Arnold Kimmes , Thomas Quinn , Michael Wright and others
Receiver:
Steven S Scholes
Intervenor_defendant:
Frank Quinn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00083
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00824
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JTH Tax Inc v. Lee
as 4:2007cv04063
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax Inc
Defendant:
Terri Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
JTH Tax Inc v. Lee
as 4:2007mc04008
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax Inc
Defendant:
Ronald Lee and Terri Lee
Miscellaneous Party:
Terri Lee
Kinslow v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Kinslow
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Larry Warg, Linda Depauw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
