Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Jackson v. Shelly
as 2:2020cv02199
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Jackson, Jr
Defendant:
. Shelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03639
Defendant:
Kenneth Fox, Susan Woodhouse, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Entzel
as 1:2020cv01114
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Adams
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01063
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LEO DALE ROSE and TERRY LEE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pyles v. Unknown Party
as 3:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Pyles
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc. et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2017cv00320
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc, Michael's Grain Farm, Inc., Fred Timothy Donaldson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUTOUR v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00557
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE DUTOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry v. Talbot et al
as 2:2016cv02379
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Berry
Defendant:
Paul Talbot, Mary Miller, John Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv03224
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE DAWSON, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
