Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
Konecny (PS) v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
State of Texas, Collin County Texas, Tarrant County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Sharp, et al v. CGG Land (U.S.)
as 15-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. DANE SHARP, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, MARIANO ESPINOZA, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CGG LAND (U.S.) INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeLong v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services et al
as 5:2014cv01439
Plaintiff:
Michael DeLong
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services , Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Board of Directors , Terry White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Cuke et al
as 5:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marion Lewis
Defendant:
FNU Cuke, Terri White and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
