Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,686
County of Tuscarawas, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45098
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The County of Tuscarawas, Ohio, The State of Ohio ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney of Tuscarawas County, Ryan Styer, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CASTELLO v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 2:2023cv07341
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN CASTELLO
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re: ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company et al v. Celgene Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07871
Plaintiff: Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc.
Defendant: Celgene Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Aurobindo Pharma Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Marion County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Marion County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA R&D IP, LLC et al v. EUGIA PHARMA SPECIALITIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv06667
Plaintiff: THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA R&D IP, LLC, THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA US, INC., THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA IRELAND LIMITED and others
Defendant: EUGIA PHARMA SPECIALITIES LTD., EUGIA US LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Counter Claimant: LUPIN INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45091
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04361
Defendant: SpecGX, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Respondent: Linda Singer, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC and Illinois Department of Public Health - NonParty Subpoena Recipient
Plaintiff: City of Chicago
Intervenor: USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune Company
Petitioner: AbbVie Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Cook County Illinois Medical Examiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
WILLIAMS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv20392
Plaintiff: RICHARD WILLIAMS
Defendant: ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, HUAHAI U.S. INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HURST v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv20308
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER J. HURST
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., ACETERIS, LCC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chu v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45930
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jordan Chu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?