Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Tew v. Smith Roofing LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Thommas Tew
Defendant:
Smith Roofing LLC, Crum & Foster Specialty and Old Republic Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Eugenia Carazo-Tew et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07403
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Carazo-Tew and David Tew
Petitioner:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Flagstar Bank
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, NPA Associates, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Winifred Jiau v. Randy Tews
as 22-15576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINIFRED JIAU
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY L. TEWS, Warden, FCI-Dublin
Mark Hays v. Randy Tews
as 20-55651
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK LINNEAR HAYS
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY L. TEWS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Winifred Jiau v. Randy Tews
as 19-15825
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY L. TEWS, Warden, FCI-Dublin
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINIFRED JIAU
Jose Rodriguez-Ramirez v. Jefferson R. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv02289
Defendant:
M. Booker, Heriberto H. Telez, Does 13-25 health care providers, professional capacities and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diego Rivera Valencia v. Franklin Rutdlege et al
as 5:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Franklin Rutdlege and Randy L. Tews
Plaintiff:
Diego Rivera Valencia
Townsend et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2017cv06756
Plaintiff:
Danyelle Townsend and Ken Tew
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tews v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01728
Plaintiff:
Daniake Tews
Defendant:
Sunbelt Rentals Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
