Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,395
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 24-1373
Petitioner: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
Kohute v. Texaco Gas Station
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: Kevin James Kohute
Defendant: Texaco Gas Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de PR Inc., et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff: ASOCIACION DE DETALLISTAS DE GASOLINA DE PUERTO RICO, INC., A&E SERVICE STATION, INC., ANTONIO JUAN LEON and others
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, represented by its Governor Hon. Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia, HON. DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, HON. HIRAM TORRES MONTALVO, as Interim Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico and others
Loyd, Jr. v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Defendant: Sabic Innovative Plastics US, LLC, Trammo, Inc, Rain CII Carbon LLC and others
Plaintiff: William L. Loyd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30022
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As successor in interest to Texaco, Incorporated
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30030
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to the California Company and Chevron Oil Company and Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor: Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor: Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
Last Chance Texaco, LLC v. Wilshire Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Last Chance Texaco, LLC
Defendant: Wilshire Insurance Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Jacob v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2023cv07414
Plaintiff: Herbert J Jacob, Jr., Margaret R Jacob, Richard E Jacob and others
Defendant: Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, Eagle Inc., Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?