Cases 31 - 40 of 45,375
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Parker v. Curvey et al
as 4:2024cv01497
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Diamiane Diane Curvey and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker et al v. Lawrenz et al
as 4:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Callie Walker, Estate of Cleon Johnson, Kahill Johnson and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Lawrenz, John Doe, Madison County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40255
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Texas Chemistry Council v. EPA
as 24-60193
Petitioner:
Texas Chemistry Council
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Richardson v. Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Richardson
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Odom v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 5:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Henry Odom
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
