Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Turner v. Montford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Turner
Defendant:
Montford Unit and Texas Tech University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pickett v. Texas Tech Univ
as 24-10304
Plaintiff:
Amy Pickett
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, (TTUHSC), Barbara Cherry, individually and in her official capacity as Department Chair of Leadership Studies and Michael Evans, individually and in his official capacity as Dean of School of Nursing
Vacik v. Texas Tech University
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Vacik
Defendant:
Texas Tech University
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center et al
as 4:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Turner
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and Dr. Marcia J Odal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oatman v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Oatman
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
