Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Eric Rundquist v. Margaret Mayfield, et al
as 12-15360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC P. RUNDQUIST
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET MAYFIELD, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, 37th Judicial Circuit of Alabama, NICK ABBETT and others
:
SERVICE
Janie Cobb v. State of Alabama, et al
as 12-14764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANIE D. COBB
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, JACKIE GRAHAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv02467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-13665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sammy Simpson, I I v. Alabama Department of Human Re, et al
as 12-11710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMMY EDWARD SIMPSON, I I
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, MOBILE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, BALDWIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES and others
Curtis Tompkins v. Dorothy Rogers, et al
as 12-10983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS T. TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY ROGERS, FAMILY COURT and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Birmingham, Alabama
Rundquist v. Mayfield et al (MAG+)
as 3:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Eric P. Rundquist
Defendant:
Margaret Mayfield , The District Attorney's Office, 37th Judicial Circuit of Alabama , Nick Abbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Bethel-Muhammad et al
as 2:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda Bethel-Muhammad, Lajenna Hatcher, Dallas County Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
