Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cullars-Doty et al v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2021cv00094
Defendant:
City of St. Paul, Ofc. Daniel Peck, Ofc. Sheila Lambie and others
Plaintiff:
Monique C. Cullars-Doty, Ericka Cullars-Golden, Pauline J. Cullars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seifert et al v. IMT Insurance Company
as 0:2020cv01102
Defendant:
IMT Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Harmar Barbers, Inc., Kenneth Seifert d/b/a The Hair Place and Kenneth Seifert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barber
Abood et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02186
Plaintiff:
David Akin, Jonathan L. Anderson, Wesley Barnhouse and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Daniel II Joseph Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
McKinnon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hutchinson, Brandon Sheene, Bennett Stanley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hicks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02092
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hahn, Amorris Conley, Jonathan Stark and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
