Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 180
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff: Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant: Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of New York, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-5103
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of New York, State of Hawaii, State of New Jersey and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States, Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as the Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service
Coalition on Homelessness, et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-15087
Plaintiff / Appellee: COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS, TORO CASTANO, SARAH CRONK and others
Defendant / Appellant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and others
Amicus Curiae: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City and County of San Francisco
as 4:2021cv02871
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Candlestick Heights Community Alliance v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff: Candlestick Heights Community Alliance
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Coalition on Homelessness et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05502
Plaintiff: Coalition on Homelessness, Toro Castao, Sarah Cronk and others
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Department of Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, et al v. David Chiu, et al
as 22-15824
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAN FRANCISCANS SUPPORTING PROP B, EDWIN M LEE ASIAN PACIFIC DEMOCRATIC CLUB PAC SPONSORED BY NEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SAN FRANCISCO ADVOCACY and TODD DAVID
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION, CHESA BOUDIN, in his official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney and others
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B et al v. Chiu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02785
Plaintiff: San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and Todd David
Defendant: David Chiu, San Francisco Ethics Commission, Chesa Boudin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AZ, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3272
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MONTANA and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA, CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, NM, CITY OF BOSTON, MA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?