Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Batter et al v. Hecla Mining Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04883
Plaintiff: Cheryl Batter, Jeffrey H. Batter, Pasquale Bilello and others
Defendant: Phillips S. Baker, Jr., Lindsay A. Hall, Lawrence P. Radford and others
Petitioner: Emma Gluck, James Hughes, Dave Dapcevich and others
George Hannon, et al v. American Express Company, et al
as 18-16115
: In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE J. HANNON
Plaintiff - Appellee: FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO and THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.
as 17-4144
Plaintiff: Roxy D. Sullivan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Lindsey Rankin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: David E. Kaplan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Michael S. Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Chi-Pin Hsu, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant: S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., S.A.C. Capital Advisors, Inc., CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC and others
Appellant: Reed Smith LLP
Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.
as 17-4067
Plaintiff: Roxy D. Sullivan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Lindsey Rankin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael S. Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Chi-Pin Hsu, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Fred M. Ross and others
Defendant: S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., S.A.C. Capital Advisors, Inc., CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC and others
Appellant: Reed Smith LLP
George Hannon v. Michael J Loughlin et al
as 3:2016cv06624
Plaintiff: George Hannon
Defendant: Michael J. Loughlin, Timothy J. Sloan, John G. Stumpf and others
Movant: The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 4:2016cv05817
Plaintiff: Elson and Robert Elson
Defendant: WELLS FARGO & COMPAY, Stumpf,, John G. Stumpf and others
Petitioner: The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 3:2016cv05817
Plaintiff: Robert Elson
Defendant: John G. Stumpf, Carrie Tolstedt, John D. Baker, II and others
Movant: The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Loughlin et al
as 4:2016cv05592
Plaintiff: Cook, Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit, Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and others
Defendant: Loughlin, Suzanne M. Vautrinot, John R. Shrewsberry and others
Petitioner: The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Ji-Yong Ryu v. HCP, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04981
Movant: Albert J. Belle and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Defendant: Steven M. Cavanaugh, HCP, Inc., HCR ManorCare and others
Interested Party: City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and Societe Generale Securities Services GmbH
Plaintiff: Ji-Yong Ryu
Boynton Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. HCP, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01106
Defendant: HCP, Inc, Lauralee E. Martin, HCP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Boynton Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Petitioner: Societe Generale Securities Services GmbH, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and Albert J Belle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?