Cases 71 - 80 of 6,137
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Janeen Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, M Lopez and C McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Danahy et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Thomas Danahy, Kimberly M Danahy, Jason Black and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Chicago Department of Water Management and City of Chicago Department of Water Billings and Collections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Hodgeman, B. J. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miller v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Roxanne K Miller
Defendant:
Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Markeas D. Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dominick Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe, The City of Chicago and Francisco Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wynne Transportation LLC v City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Wynne Transportation LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
