Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
COLON v. KINNEL et al
as 5:2021cv03337
Plaintiff:
RAMONA COLON
Defendant:
OFFICER AARON EUGENE KINNEL, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES, OFFICERS JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SAUNDERS v. BB&T BANK et al
as 2:2020cv04530
Defendant:
BB&T BANK, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NICHOLAS ENGLESSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. LIGOURI et al
as 5:2020cv01457
Defendant:
BRIAN HERNCANE, COREY LOLLIS, WAWA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. CITY OF EASTON et al
as 5:2019cv04430
Defendant:
CITY OF EASTON ZONING HEARING BOARD and CITY OF EASTON
Plaintiff:
ONE 6 LLC, ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LVL CO. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FENNELL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv01972
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, C.O. BAKER, C.O. CROWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARCUS FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVEROS-SANCHEZ et al v. CITY OF EASTON et al
as 5:2019cv00545
Defendant:
ELIZABETH GEHMAN, JOHN BAST and CITY OF EASTON
Plaintiff:
EDGAR RIVEROS-SANCHEZ and MARIA RIVEROS -SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME et al v. BURD et al
as 5:2019cv00388
Defendant:
BRIAN CONNAUGHTON, BRIAN BURD, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE NEWSOME and BECKY LIBERTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
