Cases 1 - 10 of 92
GRIVAS v. CITY OF LANCASTER
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
IRENE GRIVAS
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone
as 2:2023cv04187
Plaintiff:
Geoff Stone
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stone v. CITY OF LANCASTER
as 5:2023cv04187
Plaintiff:
Geoff Stone
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
BROCK v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
CYRENA BROCK
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, SERGEANTS/LIEUTENANTS JOHN DOE 1-10 and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COLON v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
JERRY COLON
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, CITY OF LANCASTER, OFFICER JAY HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Colon v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Jerry Colon
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, CITY OF LANCASTER and OFFICER JAY HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
YOUST v. ROTH et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUST
Defendant:
BRUCE ROTH, HONORABLE JUDGE MERRILL M. SPAHN, JR., DETECTIVE CHRIS DISSINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAPEPULA v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv04741
Plaintiff:
SALOME NZEBA KAPEPULA
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DEREK R. KANUCK, Individually and in his official capacity as an Officer for the Lancaster Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv03771
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER doing business as LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU and JACOB BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
