Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rangel v. Satele et al
as 0:2023cv02535
Plaintiff:
Mario Rangel
Defendant:
Tommy Satele and City of Plymouth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colvin v. Hennepin County Attorneys' Office et al
as 0:2020cv00639
Plaintiff:
Brenda Calloway Colvin
Defendant:
Hennepin County Child Protection, The City of Plymouth and Hennepin County Attorneys' Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Udoh et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv03119
Plaintiff:
Tonya Udoh and Emem Udoh
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Charles E. Johnson , Donothan Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. City of Brooklyn Park et al
as 0:2014cv04698
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Sapp
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Park, Chisago County , City of Forest Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spigner v. City of Plymouth, Minnesota et al
as 0:2014cv03453
Plaintiff:
Herbert R. Spigner
Defendant:
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, Jeffrey Swiatkiewicz and Roger Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shugri v. Home Depot USA et al
as 0:2014cv03443
Plaintiff:
Halima Shugri
Defendant:
Home Depot USA and City of Plymouth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kerr Karasov v. Caplan Law Firm, P.A. et al
as 0:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mae Kerr Karasov
Defendant:
Caplan Law Firm, P.A., City of Bloomington, City of Brooklyn Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. City of Amboy et al
as 0:2014cv00722
Defendant:
City of Amboy, City of Bloomington, Blue Earth County and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Grant Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krekelberg v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv03562
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Krekelberg
Defendant:
Anoka County, City of Anoka , City of Apple Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
