Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Booth v. City of Watertown
as 23-811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick M. Booth
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Watertown, Watertown Police Department, Dustin C. Shawcross, Police Officer and others
Booth v. City of Watertown et al
as 5:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Booth
Defendant:
City of Watertown, Watertown Police Department, Dustin C. Shawcross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goode v. Manchester
as 20-2287
Defendant:
Justice James P. McClusky, Patricia L. Dziuba, Assistant District Attorney of Jefferson County, Judge Eugene Langone, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Virginia R. Kelly, Watertown Police Department Officer, Donna J. Manchester, Christal L. Jackson Deline and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lauren S. Goode
Granger v. The City of Watertown et al
as 8:2020cv00189
Defendant:
The City of Watertown, Police Officer Kenny Noone, The City of Watertown Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn G. Granger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goode v. Manchester et al
as 5:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Travis F. Alcombrack, Judge James P. McClusky, Kristyna S. Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren S. Goode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forsythe v. City of Watertown et al
as 5:2017cv01132
Plaintiff:
Chad Forsythe
Defendant:
City of Watertown, Charles Donoghue, Cristin N. Fuhrman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biccum et al v. City of Watertown, et al
as 7:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lynn Biccum , T.B., J.B., J.B., and B.B. and James Biccum
Defendant:
City of Watertown, New York , Watertown, New York Police Department , Charles Donoghue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
