Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Glenn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Danny Clinton Glenn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lewis v. Southwellness LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01808
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lewis
Defendant:
Southwellness LLC, Tyler Southwell and Jasmine Southwell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Clinton Dale Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Clinton Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ward #113886 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Calvin Clinton Ward
Defendant:
David Shinn, Kenneth Herman, Adam Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage #076242 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08279
Petitioner:
John Clinton Savage
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burris v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021cv00490
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Clinton Rachar Burris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eldridge v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Respondent:
Patricia K Cushwa and Barbara Von Blanckensee
Petitioner:
Clinton T Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strange v. SP Processing LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Suren Prasad and SP Processing LLC
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
