Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Barnes v. US Department of Veterans Affairs (652)
as 3:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Linda Barnes
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs (652)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Dagulo v. The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice) et al
as 2:2019cv00695
Defendant:
City of Hampton, VA, Steven Lucas, The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice) and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Raneses Dagulo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv00922
Plaintiff:
Brian Brown
Defendant:
Federick Jackson, Darryl Blackwell, Raymond Bantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
as 1:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Jose Rivero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
