Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 915
The Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: The Northern Cheyenne Tribe
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2778
Plaintiff: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of Interior and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor: SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff: ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Oswick et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant: Charles Edward Oswick and U.S Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant: Martha Williams, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Morrison v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2127
Plaintiff: JAMES MORRISON
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KALA MCKINNEY, JOHN GRINSELL and others
Alaska Industrial Development and Expert Authority v. U.S. Department of the Interior
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Alaska Industrial Development and Expert Authority
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
United States of America et al v. General Recycling of Washington LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: General Recycling of Washington, LLC, The David J. Joseph Company, Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
United States of America et al v. Crowley Marine Services Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: The United States of America, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Department of the Interior, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: Crowley Marine Services, Inc., 8th Avenue Terminals, Inc., Washington Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor: Gwich'in Steering Committee, Alaska Wilderness League, Alaska Wildlife Alliance and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?