Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. United States of Amerikkka et al
as 1:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Williams
Defendant:
United States of Amerikkka and U.S. Marshalls Service of MD; Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1445 Immigration: Application for Naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01439
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Head v. All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
Charles Head
Defendant:
S. Eirich, Warden J.R. Bell, All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. Dept. of Justice et al
as 8:2017cv00633
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Young
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice, Matthew Mellady and Karen L Haas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 8:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Lacy Lee Williams, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice, National Archives and Records Administration, Mary Frances Ronan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. US Dept. of Justice
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Catherine Denise Randolph
Defendant:
US Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520
McCarthy v. US Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv03075
Plaintiff:
William McCarthy
Defendant:
US Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and FCI Cumberland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
